Future 10/22 build.

General firearm discussions that do not fit in our specific firearm-related forums.
Elk Creek
Posts: 1508
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2023 2:01 pm

Future 10/22 build.

Post by Elk Creek »

Well Sako and I had a gun store crawl today. We started in Boulder, yep Boulder of all places, they had some cool stuff. Nothing stood out as a gotta have. At the end of the afternoon we stopped in Longmont at a gun and pawn where I spotted an ER Shaw 18” 22lr blued .920 bull barrel in factory shipping packaging. I asked to open it it’s NIB! All for $49!!! Looks like I’m building a 10/22….🤣
Attachments
IMG_0134.jpeg
IMG_0134.jpeg (1.06 MiB) Viewed 3306 times
IMG_0136.jpeg
IMG_0136.jpeg (1.6 MiB) Viewed 3306 times
User avatar
CPJ 2.0
Posts: 3769
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 1:57 pm

Re: Future 10/22 build.

Post by CPJ 2.0 »

Well yeah. Because that’s the only reason you need!
I’d probably go with a NON Ruger action. Brownells has a few different ones.
But, I’m kinda bitter. My new Charger has the mounting hole off from where it should be by a bit. Not enough to fit the sloppy ass factory stock, but not even close in my Grey Birch chassis.

Maybe after Ruger builds a few they will figure out where the holes go. 🙄
“The shepherd slaughters more of the flock than the wolf ever will.”
Elk Creek
Posts: 1508
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2023 2:01 pm

Re: Future 10/22 build.

Post by Elk Creek »

CPJ 2.0 wrote: Fri May 23, 2025 11:33 pm Well yeah. Because that’s the only reason you need!
I’d probably go with a NON Ruger action. Brownells has a few different ones.
But, I’m kinda bitter. My new Charger has the mounting hole off from where it should be by a bit. Not enough to fit the sloppy ass factory stock, but not even close in my Grey Birch chassis.

Maybe after Ruger builds a few they will figure out where the holes go. 🙄
I really like integral scope base on the brownells receivers… Ruger has had some QC issues lately.
Diver43
Posts: 1208
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 4:16 am

Re: Future 10/22 build.

Post by Diver43 »

With that barrel, I bet when finished it is more accurate than I am. 😁
Elk Creek
Posts: 1508
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2023 2:01 pm

Re: Future 10/22 build.

Post by Elk Creek »

Diver43 wrote: Fri May 23, 2025 11:41 pm With that barrel, I bet when finished it is more accurate than I am. 😁
I would imagine it will be a shooter!
User avatar
CPJ 2.0
Posts: 3769
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 1:57 pm

Re: Future 10/22 build.

Post by CPJ 2.0 »

Elk Creek wrote: Fri May 23, 2025 11:36 pm
CPJ 2.0 wrote: Fri May 23, 2025 11:33 pm Well yeah. Because that’s the only reason you need!
I’d probably go with a NON Ruger action. Brownells has a few different ones.
But, I’m kinda bitter. My new Charger has the mounting hole off from where it should be by a bit. Not enough to fit the sloppy ass factory stock, but not even close in my Grey Birch chassis.

Maybe after Ruger builds a few they will figure out where the holes go. 🙄
I really like integral scope base on the brownells receivers… Ruger has had some QC issues lately.

Yeah, it’s a shame. If the last 4 Rugers I’ve bought, 3 had issues. I sent one back to get fixed, I fixed another, and this one I didn’t even bother because they will say it’s “in spec” since it fits the stock it came with. Not worth the effort.
“The shepherd slaughters more of the flock than the wolf ever will.”
User avatar
CPJ 2.0
Posts: 3769
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 1:57 pm

Re: Future 10/22 build.

Post by CPJ 2.0 »

If you bought the Brownels-ish action, and factory bolt and guts, with your deal of a barrel you’d be about the same money as a new 10-22. So, bonus.
“The shepherd slaughters more of the flock than the wolf ever will.”
Elk Creek
Posts: 1508
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2023 2:01 pm

Re: Future 10/22 build.

Post by Elk Creek »

CPJ 2.0 wrote: Fri May 23, 2025 11:52 pm
Elk Creek wrote: Fri May 23, 2025 11:36 pm
CPJ 2.0 wrote: Fri May 23, 2025 11:33 pm Well yeah. Because that’s the only reason you need!
I’d probably go with a NON Ruger action. Brownells has a few different ones.
But, I’m kinda bitter. My new Charger has the mounting hole off from where it should be by a bit. Not enough to fit the sloppy ass factory stock, but not even close in my Grey Birch chassis.

Maybe after Ruger builds a few they will figure out where the holes go. 🙄
I really like integral scope base on the brownells receivers… Ruger has had some QC issues lately.

Yeah, it’s a shame. If the last 4 Rugers I’ve bought, 3 had issues. I sent one back to get fixed, I fixed another, and this one I didn’t even bother because they will say it’s “in spec” since it fits the stock it came with. Not worth the effort.
I bought a 44 special Bisley flattop last year and the first time out the timing was off. The hand wouldn’t rotate the cylinder enough for the bolt to lock the cylinder. It went back, came back in a week with a much better trigger and a bank vault like lock up. It’s very accurate, now.
Elk Creek
Posts: 1508
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2023 2:01 pm

Re: Future 10/22 build.

Post by Elk Creek »

CPJ 2.0 wrote: Fri May 23, 2025 11:53 pm If you bought the Brownels-ish action, and factory bolt and guts, with your deal of a barrel you’d be about the same money as a new 10-22. So, bonus.
I have a spare trigger group already. Just like Johnny Cash, “I got it one piece at a time!”
User avatar
CPJ 2.0
Posts: 3769
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 1:57 pm

Re: Future 10/22 build.

Post by CPJ 2.0 »

Elk Creek wrote: Fri May 23, 2025 11:59 pm
CPJ 2.0 wrote: Fri May 23, 2025 11:53 pm If you bought the Brownels-ish action, and factory bolt and guts, with your deal of a barrel you’d be about the same money as a new 10-22. So, bonus.
I have a spare trigger group already. Just like Johnny Cash, “I got it one piece at a time!”
Perfect.

As to the Bisley, does no one even check them? (Obviously)
“The shepherd slaughters more of the flock than the wolf ever will.”
Elk Creek
Posts: 1508
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2023 2:01 pm

Re: Future 10/22 build.

Post by Elk Creek »

CPJ 2.0 wrote: Sat May 24, 2025 1:17 am
Elk Creek wrote: Fri May 23, 2025 11:59 pm
CPJ 2.0 wrote: Fri May 23, 2025 11:53 pm If you bought the Brownels-ish action, and factory bolt and guts, with your deal of a barrel you’d be about the same money as a new 10-22. So, bonus.
I have a spare trigger group already. Just like Johnny Cash, “I got it one piece at a time!”
Perfect.

As to the Bisley, does no one even check them? (Obviously)
I’m beginning to think they have a lottery version of QC,,,, one, two take a few days off three four
User avatar
shotgunshooter3
Posts: 627
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 4:07 pm

Re: Future 10/22 build.

Post by shotgunshooter3 »

Great score! I have that same barrel on my 10/22 build and it shoots great.
"Speed is the economy of motion" - Scott Jedlinski
User avatar
Bigslug
Posts: 1116
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 3:28 am

Re: Future 10/22 build.

Post by Bigslug »

"WARNING: UNFIRED ROUNDS MAY NOT ALWAYS EJECT"

Seriously? WTF?

I wonder if the guys who work in nuclear power plants have to deal with warning labels stating that the shielding protecting them from plutonium might expose them to lead. :roll:
WWJMBD?

I believe we should stand on Ceremony. . . while our friends handcuff the sanctimonious little prick and take him away.
Japhy
Posts: 706
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2023 4:19 am

Re: Future 10/22 build.

Post by Japhy »

CPJ
Which Rugers have had problems recently?
I am shopping for a MK iv right now
User avatar
GrapeApe
Posts: 2207
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 2:26 am

Re: Future 10/22 build.

Post by GrapeApe »

I'm guessing it has a Bentz chamber, which is slightly shorter that SAAMI spec
"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it." - Samuel Clemens (aka Mark Twain)
User avatar
CPJ 2.0
Posts: 3769
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 1:57 pm

Re: Future 10/22 build.

Post by CPJ 2.0 »

Bigslug wrote: Sat May 24, 2025 3:03 pm "WARNING: UNFIRED ROUNDS MAY NOT ALWAYS EJECT"

Seriously? WTF?

I wonder if the guys who work in nuclear power plants have to deal with warning labels stating that the shielding protecting them from plutonium might expose them to lead. :roll:
Has nothing to do with safety warnings. It’s just a fact. It’s a tight match chamber.
They also won’t shoot CCI Stingers because eve case is longer.
“The shepherd slaughters more of the flock than the wolf ever will.”
User avatar
CPJ 2.0
Posts: 3769
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 1:57 pm

Re: Future 10/22 build.

Post by CPJ 2.0 »

Japhy wrote: Sat May 24, 2025 3:17 pm CPJ
Which Rugers have had problems recently?
I am shopping for a MK iv right now
Lc9. Locked up after a few shots. Sent it back and it got a new slide and barrel.

.223 ranch rifle. Had burrs from the machining process ALL over it. Like metal slivers hanging off. If they didn’t see it during assembly, then they have retarded children doing assembly.

10-22. Mounting hole was out of location. Enough an aftermarket (tight tolerance) stock wouldn’t fit.
“The shepherd slaughters more of the flock than the wolf ever will.”
Elk Creek
Posts: 1508
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2023 2:01 pm

Re: Future 10/22 build.

Post by Elk Creek »

Bigslug wrote: Sat May 24, 2025 3:03 pm "WARNING: UNFIRED ROUNDS MAY NOT ALWAYS EJECT"

Seriously? WTF?

I wonder if the guys who work in nuclear power plants have to deal with warning labels stating that the shielding protecting them from plutonium might expose them to lead. :roll:
Yes Bentz chamber, it’s tight.
Wambli Ska
Posts: 3886
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:09 pm

Re: Future 10/22 build.

Post by Wambli Ska »

The cheapest route is to find a well used 10/22 locally (pawn shop or Armslist) and replace the barrel with your new one, Alumahyde the whole thing and put in a new stock it chassis.
User avatar
Justsomedude
Posts: 1287
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 2:49 am

Re: Future 10/22 build.

Post by Justsomedude »

I'm well familiar with match chambers but that would drive me nuts. I'd be reaming that out to a standard chamber if it were mine.
There's a few manufacturers (Walther comes ro mind) that have European cut chambers. Apparently their 22lr is a bit smaller and those guns hardly function with our ammo until the chamber is reamed out. I actually just did a P22 a week or so ago now that I think about it.
User avatar
Gila
Posts: 422
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 3:38 am

Re: Future 10/22 build.

Post by Gila »

Japhy wrote: Sat May 24, 2025 3:17 pm CPJ
Which Rugers have had problems recently?
I am shopping for a MK iv right now
I have one. You'll like it.
No good deed goes unpunished.
Japhy
Posts: 706
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2023 4:19 am

Re: Future 10/22 build.

Post by Japhy »

CPJ 2.0 wrote: Sat May 24, 2025 4:23 pm
Japhy wrote: Sat May 24, 2025 3:17 pm CPJ
Which Rugers have had problems recently?
I am shopping for a MK iv right now
Lc9. Locked up after a few shots. Sent it back and it got a new slide and barrel.

.223 ranch rifle. Had burrs from the machining process ALL over it. Like metal slivers hanging off. If they didn’t see it during assembly, then they have retarded children doing assembly.

10-22. Mounting hole was out of location. Enough an aftermarket (tight tolerance) stock wouldn’t fit.
Thats across a broad swath of product!
Meaning the issues are with the shop
User avatar
jbp-ohio
Posts: 1156
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 2:55 pm

Re: Future 10/22 build.

Post by jbp-ohio »

Elk Creek wrote: Sat May 24, 2025 4:46 pm
Bigslug wrote: Sat May 24, 2025 3:03 pm "WARNING: UNFIRED ROUNDS MAY NOT ALWAYS EJECT"

Seriously? WTF?

I wonder if the guys who work in nuclear power plants have to deal with warning labels stating that the shielding protecting them from plutonium might expose them to lead. :roll:
Yes Bentz chamber, it’s tight.
My Magnum Research barrel wouldn't eject rounds until I put in a Volquartsen Sharp Edge extractor. 100% now.....
Japhy
Posts: 706
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2023 4:19 am

Re: Future 10/22 build.

Post by Japhy »

Gila wrote: Sat May 24, 2025 11:09 pm
Japhy wrote: Sat May 24, 2025 3:17 pm CPJ
Which Rugers have had problems recently?
I am shopping for a MK iv right now
I have one. You'll like it.
Gila, just attempted to send a PM. looks like its stuck in the outbox
User avatar
Gila
Posts: 422
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 3:38 am

Re: Future 10/22 build.

Post by Gila »

Japhy wrote: Sun May 25, 2025 5:55 pm
Gila wrote: Sat May 24, 2025 11:09 pm
Japhy wrote: Sat May 24, 2025 3:17 pm CPJ
Which Rugers have had problems recently?
I am shopping for a MK iv right now
I have one. You'll like it.
Gila, just attempted to send a PM. looks like its stuck in the outbox
I wasn't notified, but it's all good now.
No good deed goes unpunished.
Post Reply