My 45-70 28” round barrel carbine. It has a shotgun butt plate too! A wonderful thing for a 45-70….thanks Enzo!Wambli Ska wrote: ↑Thu Jan 08, 2026 4:33 amPretty rifle![]()
And now the 45-70 1885 is finished…
Re: And now the 45-70 1885 is finished…
-
Wambli Ska
- Posts: 3965
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:09 pm
Re: And now the 45-70 1885 is finished…
Love that gun. I do need a light 45/70 in my inventory. I have the fancy trap door carbine but that’s too pretty to sling on a saddle in a scabbard. All my 1800s style rifles have metal crescent butt plates and I’ve learned to deal with them and actually enjoy them even on my 30-30 and my 45-70s. This 1885 with the long heavy octagon barrel’s recoil is very tolerable with standard loads and all of them are really tame with BP loads.
Re: And now the 45-70 1885 is finished…
Well. . .Ruger/Marlin has just baffled me: They ARE making the Classic, standard 20" barrel, semi-pistol-grip format in the .30-30 Model 336, but NOT in the 1895 .45-70. They've got a nice pile of the 16" options, but that's not where I'd steer ya.Wambli Ska wrote: ↑Thu Jan 08, 2026 3:49 pm Love that gun. I do need a light 45/70 in my inventory. . .
So probably the S&W 1854 then, as it's pretty obviously Marlin-inspired. The family dynamic has been thus: Dad's into the classic lever guns, but his hands are too much of a wreck to easily wrench on them, so I drive over & do the armorer deep-clean for him when he brings one home. My conclusion is that the Marlin 1894/1895/336 is A LOT more Glock-ish from an ease of service point of view, and the Henry & Browning-based Winchesters are a considerably greater pain in the ass.
I'll grant that it's pretty hard to beat one of the Italian 1886 / Model 71 clones for coolness, but for day to day living (and optics mounting), Marlin all the way.
WWJMBD?
I believe we should stand on Ceremony. . . while our friends handcuff the sanctimonious little prick and take him away.
I believe we should stand on Ceremony. . . while our friends handcuff the sanctimonious little prick and take him away.
Re: And now the 45-70 1885 is finished…
Very nice!
That is a L O N G barrel!
Any research into best load in 45-70 for a barrel that long?
That is a L O N G barrel!
Any research into best load in 45-70 for a barrel that long?
-
Wambli Ska
- Posts: 3965
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:09 pm
Re: And now the 45-70 1885 is finished…
I’m pretty dead set on a saddle carbine length 1886. I need to finish my rack of western gunsBigslug wrote: ↑Sun Jan 11, 2026 11:10 amWell. . .Ruger/Marlin has just baffled me: They ARE making the Classic, standard 20" barrel, semi-pistol-grip format in the .30-30 Model 336, but NOT in the 1895 .45-70. They've got a nice pile of the 16" options, but that's not where I'd steer ya.Wambli Ska wrote: ↑Thu Jan 08, 2026 3:49 pm Love that gun. I do need a light 45/70 in my inventory. . .
So probably the S&W 1854 then, as it's pretty obviously Marlin-inspired. The family dynamic has been thus: Dad's into the classic lever guns, but his hands are too much of a wreck to easily wrench on them, so I drive over & do the armorer deep-clean for him when he brings one home. My conclusion is that the Marlin 1894/1895/336 is A LOT more Glock-ish from an ease of service point of view, and the Henry & Browning-based Winchesters are a considerably greater pain in the ass.
I'll grant that it's pretty hard to beat one of the Italian 1886 / Model 71 clones for coolness, but for day to day living (and optics mounting), Marlin all the way.
-
Wambli Ska
- Posts: 3965
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:09 pm
Re: And now the 45-70 1885 is finished…
I thought it was 32” turns out it’s a 31”, oh well
So far I’m basically emptying all the factory ammo I have before I try to start fine tuning smokeless loads. A lot of it is MHS ammo which usually shoots like crap but somehow this gun shoots it very well but I haven’t grouped it yet. Just basically banging targets of opportunity in BLm land. Lots of those. The BP load is easy.