Diver43 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 15, 2023 2:22 pmYou are very right.breamfisher wrote: ↑Fri Sep 15, 2023 1:05 pm I think one of the other issues is a lack of diversity in the primary fields, which is probably fed by low-information voters who latch on to certain phrases and rally against/for them, not know what they mean, whether it's really a problem, or other issues.
It's frustrating to me to try and research a candidate and find that their website and social media are full of:
A. What they're against, not necessarily what they're for.
B. Vague references to what they're going to do, but no mention of how.
C. Buzzwords that have no real meaning (Looking at you, folks who tell me you're going to protect my "God-Given Rights" without giving examples.)
D. Have more space taken up by where and how to donate vs. how they're going to serve the people.
With options like that, there's really no cream entering into politics. Or at least not advancing.
Also, folks have lost the ability to listen to complex ideas and respond to nuance. It's why, I think, candidates who offer complex answers to complex questions get derided for talking too much versus those who provide simple answers to complex questions.
Phrases like:
Lower taxes
Cancel student debt
Keep schools safe
Save children
Free healthcare
They sound great, but in reality are impossible to do without canceling another. Nothing is free
Don’t forget:
Build a wall
Drain the swamp
Hold accountable
Well, actually, anything any one of them says is utter bull poop