Interior and build-up pics for the interested parties:
Our wise shoe salesman once said, "Nothing is safe from stupid". Lever actions are no exception:

- Ruglin 1894 6.jpeg (57.24 KiB) Viewed 765 times
Fortunately, stupid can sometimes be removed:

- Ruglin 1894 7.jpeg (88.44 KiB) Viewed 765 times
The safety deletes are easy - pull set screw from rear, take out safety to the right being careful not to lose the little ball detent, replace with the filler, lightly re-install set screw, turn the "screw" slot until the ball kicks into a dimple drilled for the purpose, tighten set screw fully down. Done.
Needed to take the actions the rest of the way down. As you'll see, the interior finish is REALLY nice, but the leading edge of the loading gate on both rifles had an unacceptably sharp burr. One of them actually had some dried blood on it - probably from the poor sod who test fired the rifle at the factory. A quick bit of file work took care of that, but here's what I got to study:

- Ruglin 1894 8.jpeg (55.52 KiB) Viewed 765 times
Bolt, ejector, and the front of the lever. The ejector is of the same 2-piece construction with the separate leaf spring as the original JM's and Remington-builds. Still contemplating the Wild West Guns 1-piece "Bear Proof" unit as an upgrade, but as these are just plinkers, I may way leave well enough alone.

- Ruglin 1894 9.jpeg (183.61 KiB) Viewed 765 times
A good shot of the really smooth finish on the receiver tang. Right or wrong, I tend to judge gun manufacturers on how they finish the stuff you CAN'T see. Being Ruger, sure, these are investment cast, but they're still doing final polish, and it isn't the rough, sand-cast look we've come to know on the inside of a lot of their past products. If you look close at the upper left corner of the photo, you can see "357" - the castings for these receivers seem to be caliber-specific. Bolts and elevators are caliber-marked too.

- Ruglin 1894 9.jpeg (183.61 KiB) Viewed 765 times
. The elevator, hammer spring tang, and its retainer are blackened, probably carbon steel. My guess is that the blackening is some kind of modern, rust-resistant melonite/tennifer/DLC, but without a deeper study, I wouldn't swear to it. In the meantime, I'd suggest all concerned treat it like something that might rust.

- Ruglin 1894 10.jpeg (101.55 KiB) Viewed 765 times

- Ruglin 1894 11.jpeg (174.5 KiB) Viewed 765 times
Side and top view of the interior of the lower tang / trigger housing - same nice attention to detail on final polish. As an aside, I got a trigger gauge on both of them, and they're both a little south of four pounds.
Soooo, really impressed with what I'm seeing. Stainless followers are on the way to replace the red plastic. Ranger Point is also sending their finger knob replacement lever screws - that's a part that frequently needs re-tightening, and the replacement allows rapid removal of the bolt for cleaning without a screwdriver. Should be a nice upgrade.
Pondering what to do with loads. My dad & I are both pretty much agreed that moderate Special loads are all we want to mess with in .44 handguns, and those will do for that carbine. We've also been loading light-ish for the .357 handguns, but I think this rifle may want something a little higher-test. Kinda defeats the purpose of one load for two guns though, so, think, think, think. . .