Charlie Kirk shot
-
Zsarvashere
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2023 4:30 pm
Re: Charlie Kirk shot
Looks like they have him.
I am glad too. The delusion coming from both sides is f ING insane. Today I learned it was Jews that killed him. I can't tell you how many times it has been said it was a professional hit coordinated by multiple on-site agents. Turns out it was an idiot kid with a deer rifle stuffed down his pants.
The left is dancing on his grave, and the right is masturbating to call to Civil War videos.
I am glad too. The delusion coming from both sides is f ING insane. Today I learned it was Jews that killed him. I can't tell you how many times it has been said it was a professional hit coordinated by multiple on-site agents. Turns out it was an idiot kid with a deer rifle stuffed down his pants.
The left is dancing on his grave, and the right is masturbating to call to Civil War videos.
- breamfisher
- Posts: 757
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 10:11 pm
Re: Charlie Kirk shot
I saw a few reports yesterday that this was the rifle used. If so... not a professional. Scope set waaaay to far back, rear ring appears to be hitting the adjustment turrets, and the front mount is hanging over the action port.
9mm kills the body, but .45 ACP destroys the soul!
-a Fudd, probably
-a Fudd, probably
Re: Charlie Kirk shot
I deleted X, too many wack jobs from both sides on my feed. It’s just too much. I loved all the nut jobs saying it was a professional hit, due to the extreme range and shot placement. Of course we know 200 yards isn’t poop, and he got lucky with the hit. Zero doubt in my mind he was aiming for the head and hit low.Zsarvashere wrote: ↑Fri Sep 12, 2025 12:39 pm Looks like they have him.
I am glad too. The delusion coming from both sides is f ING insane. Today I learned it was Jews that killed him. I can't tell you how many times it has been said it was a professional hit coordinated by multiple on-site agents. Turns out it was an idiot kid with a deer rifle stuffed down his pants.
The left is dancing on his grave, and the right is masturbating to call to Civil War videos.
Now there will be a call to ban “high powered rifles”. The positive of that is Papa McFudd will maybe get outraged since they are messing with his hunting rifles.
“The shepherd slaughters more of the flock than the wolf ever will.”
Re: Charlie Kirk shot
If it's stupid but works, it isn't stupid. Scoping a military action is often band-aid on top of band-aid, but at the end of the day, if it allows the shooter to deliver the accuracy potential of the rifle, the job is done.breamfisher wrote: ↑Fri Sep 12, 2025 12:54 pm 20250911_193439.jpg
I saw a few reports yesterday that this was the rifle used. If so... not a professional. Scope set waaaay to far back, rear ring appears to be hitting the adjustment turrets, and the front mount is hanging over the action port.
And that's still a way sexier "sniper rifle" than the 91/30 Mosin / 3.5X PU that the Soviets "professionally" made by the hundreds of thousands.
WWJMBD?
I believe we should stand on Ceremony. . . while our friends handcuff the sanctimonious little prick and take him away.
I believe we should stand on Ceremony. . . while our friends handcuff the sanctimonious little prick and take him away.
-
Zsarvashere
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2023 4:30 pm
Re: Charlie Kirk shot
I had a good laugh at that yesterday. I did not post and comment because I was not sure it was real it was so bad.breamfisher wrote: ↑Fri Sep 12, 2025 12:54 pm 20250911_193439.jpg
I saw a few reports yesterday that this was the rifle used. If so... not a professional. Scope set waaaay to far back, rear ring appears to be hitting the adjustment turrets, and the front mount is hanging over the action port.
Last edited by Zsarvashere on Fri Sep 12, 2025 1:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Charlie Kirk shot
My guess was aimed body shot that hit high. Sniper 101 is that up/down angle shots need to be compensated for by holding low, and pretty much all of the unwashed masses don't know that. At any rate .30 caliber efficiency says it really doesn't matter much.CPJ 2.0 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 12, 2025 1:13 pmI deleted X, too many wack jobs from both sides on my feed. It’s just too much. I loved all the nut jobs saying it was a professional hit, due to the extreme range and shot placement. Of course we know 200 yards isn’t poop, and he got lucky with the hit. Zero doubt in my mind he was aiming for the head and hit low.Zsarvashere wrote: ↑Fri Sep 12, 2025 12:39 pm Looks like they have him.
I am glad too. The delusion coming from both sides is f ING insane. Today I learned it was Jews that killed him. I can't tell you how many times it has been said it was a professional hit coordinated by multiple on-site agents. Turns out it was an idiot kid with a deer rifle stuffed down his pants.
The left is dancing on his grave, and the right is masturbating to call to Civil War videos.
Now there will be a call to ban “high powered rifles”. The positive of that is Papa McFudd will maybe get outraged since they are messing with his hunting rifles.
Calls to ban this. Calls to ban that. I've never quite been able to fathom how a Gewehr 98 is any less a "weapon of war" than an AR-15. . .or a sharpened stick, for that matter.
WWJMBD?
I believe we should stand on Ceremony. . . while our friends handcuff the sanctimonious little prick and take him away.
I believe we should stand on Ceremony. . . while our friends handcuff the sanctimonious little prick and take him away.
-
Zsarvashere
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2023 4:30 pm
Re: Charlie Kirk shot
Yes. I almost pulled my hair out listening to all the former FBI, Marshalls, Law Enforcement, whatever talking about how skillfully one would need to b to do it. I will not let my kid go on his first deer hunt if he could not make a 200 yard shot.CPJ 2.0 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 12, 2025 1:13 pm
I deleted X, too many wack jobs from both sides on my feed. It’s just too much. I loved all the nut jobs saying it was a professional hit, due to the extreme range and shot placement. Of course we know 200 yards isn’t poop, and he got lucky with the hit. Zero doubt in my mind he was aiming for the head and hit low.
Now there will be a call to ban “high powered rifles”. The positive of that is Papa McFudd will maybe get outraged since they are messing with his hunting rifles.
I said the same thing to the wife. He was aiming for the head, or heart and "missed."
-
Zsarvashere
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2023 4:30 pm
Re: Charlie Kirk shot
Son of a cop.
His dad turned him in.
That is what they are reporting now.
His dad turned him in.
That is what they are reporting now.
Re: Charlie Kirk shot
They're saying Tyler Robinson was the shooter, 22 yo who confessed to his leo dad, who "held him until PD arrived"
"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it." - Samuel Clemens (aka Mark Twain)
-
Zsarvashere
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2023 4:30 pm
Re: Charlie Kirk shot
So another spoiled shat sack of a kid that though his life was ruined because someone has a different opinion that he does.
- Justsomedude
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 2:49 am
Re: Charlie Kirk shot
Not that it matters, but I'm fairly certain that Charlie didn't even register that he was shot. That looked like a CNS hit. Especially how he started posturing immediately. I wondered if it was a deflected shot off a plate carrier but didnt say anything but of course now people are making youtube videos saying as much. Again, who knows.
-
Wambli Ska
- Posts: 4084
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:09 pm
Re: Charlie Kirk shot
That’s a rifle that was at some point set up for a kid. The front mount is actually made like that on purpose and it’s made so you can set the scope for a shorter shooter (or a compact scope) and it does not interfere with ejection of spent cases.breamfisher wrote: ↑Fri Sep 12, 2025 12:54 pm 20250911_193439.jpg
I saw a few reports yesterday that this was the rifle used. If so... not a professional. Scope set waaaay to far back, rear ring appears to be hitting the adjustment turrets, and the front mount is hanging over the action port.
They look like this one.
- breamfisher
- Posts: 757
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 10:11 pm
Re: Charlie Kirk shot
Only reinforces my "probably not a pro" assertion.
9mm kills the body, but .45 ACP destroys the soul!
-a Fudd, probably
-a Fudd, probably
-
Wambli Ska
- Posts: 4084
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:09 pm
Re: Charlie Kirk shot
ABSOLUTELY to a pro...
-
Zsarvashere
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2023 4:30 pm
Re: Charlie Kirk shot
Nope I don't buy it. He is clearly a highly trained Trans Israeli Mossad agent on lone to the Iluminatti. His goal was the facilitate the removal of all right wing tallywakers, and eating bugs as the primary source of protein.
It must suck for some to awaken from their wet dream for a revolution to throbbing azure balls this morning, as the narrative collapses.
It must suck for some to awaken from their wet dream for a revolution to throbbing azure balls this morning, as the narrative collapses.
-
Zsarvashere
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2023 4:30 pm
Re: Charlie Kirk shot
I think the worst part of all the conspiracy is that it detracts from the true tragedy of the moment.
- Justsomedude
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 2:49 am
Re: Charlie Kirk shot
Very few people follow Occums Razor anymore. Everyone wants to believe they have some esoteric knowledge that only a few others have when in reality they're just a bunch of smoothbrains.Zsarvashere wrote: ↑Fri Sep 12, 2025 5:27 pm I think the worst part of all the conspiracy is that it detracts from the true tragedy of the moment.
Re: Charlie Kirk shot
Holy crap the news headlines on YouTube’s . Fox is as bad as the rest.
“BREAKING NEWS! New updates on _____”
No. It’s LITERALLY the same story you made an hour ago with a different thumbnail. There was no new update. Just maybe you had a different talking head saying the same poop.
All media is that way now. fudge even the weather channel does what it can to keep you glued to the screen.
“BREAKING NEWS! New updates on _____”
No. It’s LITERALLY the same story you made an hour ago with a different thumbnail. There was no new update. Just maybe you had a different talking head saying the same poop.
All media is that way now. fudge even the weather channel does what it can to keep you glued to the screen.
“The shepherd slaughters more of the flock than the wolf ever will.”
-
Wambli Ska
- Posts: 4084
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:09 pm
Re: Charlie Kirk shot
Posted in a hurry and can't edit. Meant "absolutely NOT a pro".
- breamfisher
- Posts: 757
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 10:11 pm
Re: Charlie Kirk shot
I guessed that.
9mm kills the body, but .45 ACP destroys the soul!
-a Fudd, probably
-a Fudd, probably
-
Wambli Ska
- Posts: 4084
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:09 pm
Re: Charlie Kirk shot
I assumed you did but not sure if others or lurkers would get it. As further explanation, Leupold (which it seems those bases are) Used to offer these for the Mauser. I don't see them as an option in current catalog but these are the ones for the Remington 700 and you can clearly see the difference. They front base can also be reversed to support longer scopes.
-
Wambli Ska
- Posts: 4084
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:09 pm
Re: Charlie Kirk shot
They also offer a ring set that accomplishes the same for use with standard bases. Looking at the picture closer, this setup appears mote likely.
Again all supporting your statement that this is no sexy sniper rifle. Just an off the shelf hunting rig.
Again all supporting your statement that this is no sexy sniper rifle. Just an off the shelf hunting rig.
Re: Charlie Kirk shot
Gotta love the main stream media. Facts!
Where can I get this .36 Caliber rifle?
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
-
Wambli Ska
- Posts: 4084
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:09 pm
Re: Charlie Kirk shot
It's an LA "news" station. Their last gun expert left LA in 1997...