Guns & Outdoors Forum

Posted: **Fri Sep 12, 2025 12:39 pm**

Looks like they have him.

I am glad too. The delusion coming from both sides is f ING insane. Today I learned it was Jews that killed him. I can't tell you how many times it has been said it was a professional hit coordinated by multiple on-site agents. Turns out it was an idiot kid with a deer rifle stuffed down his pants.

The left is dancing on his grave, and the right is masturbating to call to Civil War videos.

Posted: **Fri Sep 12, 2025 12:54 pm**

: 20250911_193439.jpg (104.92 KiB) Viewed 2776 times

I saw a few reports yesterday that this was the rifle used. If so... not a professional. Scope set waaaay to far back, rear ring appears to be hitting the adjustment turrets, and the front mount is hanging over the action port.

Posted: **Fri Sep 12, 2025 1:13 pm**

Zsarvashere wrote: ↑Fri Sep 12, 2025 12:39 pm Looks like they have him.

I am glad too. The delusion coming from both sides is f ING insane. Today I learned it was Jews that killed him. I can't tell you how many times it has been said it was a professional hit coordinated by multiple on-site agents. Turns out it was an idiot kid with a deer rifle stuffed down his pants.

The left is dancing on his grave, and the right is masturbating to call to Civil War videos.

I deleted X, too many wack jobs from both sides on my feed. It’s just too much. I loved all the nut jobs saying it was a professional hit, due to the extreme range and shot placement. Of course we know 200 yards isn’t poop, and he got lucky with the hit. Zero doubt in my mind he was aiming for the head and hit low.

Now there will be a call to ban “high powered rifles”. The positive of that is Papa McFudd will maybe get outraged since they are messing with his hunting rifles.

Posted: **Fri Sep 12, 2025 1:26 pm**

breamfisher wrote: ↑Fri Sep 12, 2025 12:54 pm 20250911_193439.jpg

I saw a few reports yesterday that this was the rifle used. If so... not a professional. Scope set waaaay to far back, rear ring appears to be hitting the adjustment turrets, and the front mount is hanging over the action port.

If it's stupid but works, it isn't stupid. Scoping a military action is often band-aid on top of band-aid, but at the end of the day, if it allows the shooter to deliver the accuracy potential of the rifle, the job is done.

And that's still a way sexier "sniper rifle" than the 91/30 Mosin / 3.5X PU that the Soviets "professionally" made by the hundreds of thousands.

Posted: **Fri Sep 12, 2025 1:34 pm**

breamfisher wrote: ↑Fri Sep 12, 2025 12:54 pm 20250911_193439.jpg

I saw a few reports yesterday that this was the rifle used. If so... not a professional. Scope set waaaay to far back, rear ring appears to be hitting the adjustment turrets, and the front mount is hanging over the action port.

I had a good laugh at that yesterday. I did not post and comment because I was not sure it was real it was so bad.

Posted: **Fri Sep 12, 2025 1:37 pm**

CPJ 2.0 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 12, 2025 1:13 pm
Zsarvashere wrote: ↑Fri Sep 12, 2025 12:39 pm Looks like they have him.

I am glad too. The delusion coming from both sides is f ING insane. Today I learned it was Jews that killed him. I can't tell you how many times it has been said it was a professional hit coordinated by multiple on-site agents. Turns out it was an idiot kid with a deer rifle stuffed down his pants.

The left is dancing on his grave, and the right is masturbating to call to Civil War videos.
I deleted X, too many wack jobs from both sides on my feed. It’s just too much. I loved all the nut jobs saying it was a professional hit, due to the extreme range and shot placement. Of course we know 200 yards isn’t poop, and he got lucky with the hit. Zero doubt in my mind he was aiming for the head and hit low.

Now there will be a call to ban “high powered rifles”. The positive of that is Papa McFudd will maybe get outraged since they are messing with his hunting rifles.

My guess was aimed body shot that hit high. Sniper 101 is that up/down angle shots need to be compensated for by holding low, and pretty much all of the unwashed masses don't know that. At any rate .30 caliber efficiency says it really doesn't matter much.

Calls to ban this. Calls to ban that. I've never quite been able to fathom how a Gewehr 98 is any less a "weapon of war" than an AR-15. . .or a sharpened stick, for that matter.

Posted: **Fri Sep 12, 2025 1:39 pm**

CPJ 2.0 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 12, 2025 1:13 pm
I deleted X, too many wack jobs from both sides on my feed. It’s just too much. I loved all the nut jobs saying it was a professional hit, due to the extreme range and shot placement. Of course we know 200 yards isn’t poop, and he got lucky with the hit. Zero doubt in my mind he was aiming for the head and hit low.

Now there will be a call to ban “high powered rifles”. The positive of that is Papa McFudd will maybe get outraged since they are messing with his hunting rifles.

Yes. I almost pulled my hair out listening to all the former FBI, Marshalls, Law Enforcement, whatever talking about how skillfully one would need to b to do it. I will not let my kid go on his first deer hunt if he could not make a 200 yard shot.

I said the same thing to the wife. He was aiming for the head, or heart and "missed."

Posted: **Fri Sep 12, 2025 1:50 pm**

Son of a cop.

His dad turned him in.

That is what they are reporting now.

Posted: **Fri Sep 12, 2025 2:01 pm**

They're saying Tyler Robinson was the shooter, 22 yo who confessed to his leo dad, who "held him until PD arrived"

Posted: **Fri Sep 12, 2025 2:20 pm**

So another spoiled shat sack of a kid that though his life was ruined because someone has a different opinion that he does.

Posted: **Fri Sep 12, 2025 3:45 pm**

Not that it matters, but I'm fairly certain that Charlie didn't even register that he was shot. That looked like a CNS hit. Especially how he started posturing immediately. I wondered if it was a deflected shot off a plate carrier but didnt say anything but of course now people are making youtube videos saying as much. Again, who knows.

Posted: **Fri Sep 12, 2025 4:22 pm**

breamfisher wrote: ↑Fri Sep 12, 2025 12:54 pm 20250911_193439.jpg

I saw a few reports yesterday that this was the rifle used. If so... not a professional. Scope set waaaay to far back, rear ring appears to be hitting the adjustment turrets, and the front mount is hanging over the action port.

That’s a rifle that was at some point set up for a kid. The front mount is actually made like that on purpose and it’s made so you can set the scope for a shorter shooter (or a compact scope) and it does not interfere with ejection of spent cases.

They look like this one.

: IMG_0387.jpeg (15.1 KiB) Viewed 2735 times

Posted: **Fri Sep 12, 2025 4:52 pm**

Only reinforces my "probably not a pro" assertion.

Posted: **Fri Sep 12, 2025 4:59 pm**

ABSOLUTELY to a pro...

Posted: **Fri Sep 12, 2025 5:23 pm**

Nope I don't buy it. He is clearly a highly trained Trans Israeli Mossad agent on lone to the Iluminatti. His goal was the facilitate the removal of all right wing tallywakers, and eating bugs as the primary source of protein.

It must suck for some to awaken from their wet dream for a revolution to throbbing azure balls this morning, as the narrative collapses.

Posted: **Fri Sep 12, 2025 5:27 pm**

I think the worst part of all the conspiracy is that it detracts from the true tragedy of the moment.

Posted: **Fri Sep 12, 2025 6:02 pm**

Zsarvashere wrote: ↑Fri Sep 12, 2025 5:27 pm I think the worst part of all the conspiracy is that it detracts from the true tragedy of the moment.

Very few people follow Occums Razor anymore. Everyone wants to believe they have some esoteric knowledge that only a few others have when in reality they're just a bunch of smoothbrains.

Posted: **Fri Sep 12, 2025 6:10 pm**

Holy crap the news headlines on YouTube’s . Fox is as bad as the rest.
“BREAKING NEWS! New updates on _____”

No. It’s LITERALLY the same story you made an hour ago with a different thumbnail. There was no new update. Just maybe you had a different talking head saying the same poop.

All media is that way now. fudge even the weather channel does what it can to keep you glued to the screen.

Posted: **Fri Sep 12, 2025 6:48 pm**

Wambli Ska wrote: ↑Fri Sep 12, 2025 4:59 pm ABSOLUTELY to a pro...

Posted in a hurry and can't edit. Meant "absolutely NOT a pro".

Posted: **Fri Sep 12, 2025 7:05 pm**

I guessed that.

Posted: **Fri Sep 12, 2025 7:22 pm**

I assumed you did but not sure if others or lurkers would get it. As further explanation, Leupold (which it seems those bases are) Used to offer these for the Mauser. I don't see them as an option in current catalog but these are the ones for the Remington 700 and you can clearly see the difference. They front base can also be reversed to support longer scopes.

: Image 2.jpeg (42.31 KiB) Viewed 2699 times

: Image 3.jpeg (44.06 KiB) Viewed 2699 times

Posted: **Fri Sep 12, 2025 7:26 pm**

They also offer a ring set that accomplishes the same for use with standard bases. Looking at the picture closer, this setup appears mote likely.

: Image 4.jpeg (56 KiB) Viewed 2699 times

Again all supporting your statement that this is no sexy sniper rifle. Just an off the shelf hunting rig.

Posted: **Fri Sep 12, 2025 9:14 pm**

Gotta love the main stream media. Facts!

: IMG_7645.jpeg (1.55 MiB) Viewed 2687 times

Where can I get this .36 Caliber rifle?

Posted: **Fri Sep 12, 2025 9:44 pm**

Zee wrote: ↑Fri Sep 12, 2025 9:14 pm
Where can I get this .36 Caliber rifle?

Its called a .360 Buckhammer, but its really just a .358"........

Posted: **Fri Sep 12, 2025 10:51 pm**

It's an LA "news" station. Their last gun expert left LA in 1997...

Guns & Outdoors Forum

Charlie Kirk shot

Re: Charlie Kirk shot

Re: Charlie Kirk shot

Re: Charlie Kirk shot

Re: Charlie Kirk shot

Re: Charlie Kirk shot

Re: Charlie Kirk shot

Re: Charlie Kirk shot

Re: Charlie Kirk shot

Re: Charlie Kirk shot

Re: Charlie Kirk shot

Re: Charlie Kirk shot

Re: Charlie Kirk shot

Re: Charlie Kirk shot

Re: Charlie Kirk shot

Re: Charlie Kirk shot

Re: Charlie Kirk shot

Re: Charlie Kirk shot

Re: Charlie Kirk shot

Re: Charlie Kirk shot

Re: Charlie Kirk shot

Re: Charlie Kirk shot

Re: Charlie Kirk shot

Re: Charlie Kirk shot

Re: Charlie Kirk shot

Re: Charlie Kirk shot