Lite weight .38 snubbie?
-
Kansashunter
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2023 12:38 am
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
The 642 might be her thing then. I have not used any +P in mine and I am sure if I practiced it more I might get better. If you could rent one that would be great. It is funny, my wife doesn't like anything above a 380 and really dislikes revolvers. You have to keep them happy.
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
So that’s what you carry. Define stopping powerGila wrote: ↑Fri Aug 18, 2023 4:25 amA 125 grain Golden Saber .357 magnum.CPJ 2.0 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 17, 2023 11:06 pmDefine: stopping power.Gila wrote: ↑Thu Aug 17, 2023 10:43 pm
How much is your wife's or your life worth? My S&W has never failed, it is extremely concealable (I carry mine in my boot), accurate at defensive distances and has very good stopping power. My wife carried basically the same revolver, but with an aluminum frame and in .38 Plus P. At the range we learned that she had no more difficultly shooting the Plus P than the standard .38. Her revolver is no longer made, but is the same as the Lightweight 642, except for the caliber, which is now .38 Special.
“The shepherd slaughters more of the flock than the wolf ever will.”
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
So don’t terms with no definition. We are smarter than that.
“The shepherd slaughters more of the flock than the wolf ever will.”
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
Stopping power: 1. when you don't pay your electrical bill and the man from Edison puts a lock on your meter; 2. when Gavin Newsom's mandatory Teslas added to AC for 30 million people blow out the grid. . .
WWJMBD?
I believe we should stand on Ceremony. . . while our friends handcuff the sanctimonious little prick and take him away.
I believe we should stand on Ceremony. . . while our friends handcuff the sanctimonious little prick and take him away.
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
#okboomer
“The shepherd slaughters more of the flock than the wolf ever will.”
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
I'd like to cast another vote for the 32 H&R Mag in either the 431PD or 432PD or something similar.
These aren't barn burner rounds but would certainly get your attention fast. And at 13.5 oz, they're not heavy either and recoil is reported as mild. Besides, it'll satisfy that need for an oddball cartridge
https://www.gunblast.com/WBell_SW32s.htm
Like someone already mentioned, if it's at all possible, try before you buy.
These aren't barn burner rounds but would certainly get your attention fast. And at 13.5 oz, they're not heavy either and recoil is reported as mild. Besides, it'll satisfy that need for an oddball cartridge
https://www.gunblast.com/WBell_SW32s.htm
Like someone already mentioned, if it's at all possible, try before you buy.
When it hurts – observe. Life is trying to teach you something... Your pain is the breaking of the shell that encloses your understanding.
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
https://www.galleryofguns.com/genie/Def ... m=5462&a=y
.327 Federal Magnum. Ruger LCR. DA only. Can shoot .32 H&R Mag. if 327 recoil is too much.
.327 Federal Magnum. Ruger LCR. DA only. Can shoot .32 H&R Mag. if 327 recoil is too much.
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
Hmmmm.... I know Ned likes the .327, and I hadn't thought about .32 mag...
"There is nothing I can think of that is improved by inserting a smartphone into the process."
)O(
)O(
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
I wouldn't recommend the .32's for a primary carry arm unless it hugely functional for some reason. Spotty logistics are fine for the toys, but maybe not for the stuff you're going to want to practice regularly with. As wide a range as you can load the .38 for, I can't fathom what the .32's do that the .38 can't. The more miserly bullet casters like the low lead and powder requirements, but I figure the more common free .38 brass more than offsets it.
As to wifey racking slides: she being a lefty, have her stand facing the left side of the range with the pistol pointing downrange against her chest. Lock the wrists and push the elbows toward each other. I've found this works very well for our 5'-nothin" females.
As to wifey racking slides: she being a lefty, have her stand facing the left side of the range with the pistol pointing downrange against her chest. Lock the wrists and push the elbows toward each other. I've found this works very well for our 5'-nothin" females.
WWJMBD?
I believe we should stand on Ceremony. . . while our friends handcuff the sanctimonious little prick and take him away.
I believe we should stand on Ceremony. . . while our friends handcuff the sanctimonious little prick and take him away.
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
I'll try that for kicks, but she isn't going to get a semi-auto. It ain't happening...Bigslug wrote: ↑Sun Aug 20, 2023 12:25 pm I wouldn't recommend the .32's for a primary carry arm unless it hugely functional for some reason. Spotty logistics are fine for the toys, but maybe not for the stuff you're going to want to practice regularly with. As wide a range as you can load the .38 for, I can't fathom what the .32's do that the .38 can't. The more miserly bullet casters like the low lead and powder requirements, but I figure the more common free .38 brass more than offsets it.
As to wifey racking slides: she being a lefty, have her stand facing the left side of the range with the pistol pointing downrange against her chest. Lock the wrists and push the elbows toward each other. I've found this works very well for our 5'-nothin" females.
I looked at .327 Fed ammo (and the .32 mag), its more expensive to shoot that stuff than it is my Nambu!
"There is nothing I can think of that is improved by inserting a smartphone into the process."
)O(
)O(
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
The .327 was a solution in search of a problem. 100% marketing wank.Zorba wrote: ↑Sun Aug 20, 2023 7:00 pmI'll try that for kicks, but she isn't going to get a semi-auto. It ain't happening...Bigslug wrote: ↑Sun Aug 20, 2023 12:25 pm I wouldn't recommend the .32's for a primary carry arm unless it hugely functional for some reason. Spotty logistics are fine for the toys, but maybe not for the stuff you're going to want to practice regularly with. As wide a range as you can load the .38 for, I can't fathom what the .32's do that the .38 can't. The more miserly bullet casters like the low lead and powder requirements, but I figure the more common free .38 brass more than offsets it.
As to wifey racking slides: she being a lefty, have her stand facing the left side of the range with the pistol pointing downrange against her chest. Lock the wrists and push the elbows toward each other. I've found this works very well for our 5'-nothin" females.
I looked at .327 Fed ammo (and the .32 mag), its more expensive to shoot that stuff than it is my Nambu!
“The shepherd slaughters more of the flock than the wolf ever will.”
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
:6.5Creedmoor:CPJ 2.0 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 20, 2023 7:31 pmThe .327 was a solution in search of a problem. 100% marketing wank.Zorba wrote: ↑Sun Aug 20, 2023 7:00 pmI'll try that for kicks, but she isn't going to get a semi-auto. It ain't happening...Bigslug wrote: ↑Sun Aug 20, 2023 12:25 pm I wouldn't recommend the .32's for a primary carry arm unless it hugely functional for some reason. Spotty logistics are fine for the toys, but maybe not for the stuff you're going to want to practice regularly with. As wide a range as you can load the .38 for, I can't fathom what the .32's do that the .38 can't. The more miserly bullet casters like the low lead and powder requirements, but I figure the more common free .38 brass more than offsets it.
As to wifey racking slides: she being a lefty, have her stand facing the left side of the range with the pistol pointing downrange against her chest. Lock the wrists and push the elbows toward each other. I've found this works very well for our 5'-nothin" females.
I looked at .327 Fed ammo (and the .32 mag), its more expensive to shoot that stuff than it is my Nambu!
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
If the .260 could fit long bullets in the mag, yes.
“The shepherd slaughters more of the flock than the wolf ever will.”
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
Semantics.
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
Yeah. . .6.5 Creedmoor. If I had unlimited time, funds, and evil streak, I'd probably build up an NRA Match Rifle in 6.5 Carcano or Japanese and start shooting XTC again just to show that the CM's innovation, isn't.
The various .32 revolver rounds. . .I'll admit I was kinda tempted when a blue 6" Smith (disremember the model number, but a near clone of a 586) crossed my path, but when you have a number of .357's, several nice molds for them, and a finite supply of S.P.P.'s, the voice that says "WHY?" speaks pretty loudly.
The various .32 revolver rounds. . .I'll admit I was kinda tempted when a blue 6" Smith (disremember the model number, but a near clone of a 586) crossed my path, but when you have a number of .357's, several nice molds for them, and a finite supply of S.P.P.'s, the voice that says "WHY?" speaks pretty loudly.
WWJMBD?
I believe we should stand on Ceremony. . . while our friends handcuff the sanctimonious little prick and take him away.
I believe we should stand on Ceremony. . . while our friends handcuff the sanctimonious little prick and take him away.
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
And the reply to that loud voice would be. BECAUSEBigslug wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 2:46 am Yeah. . .6.5 Creedmoor. If I had unlimited time, funds, and evil streak, I'd probably build up an NRA Match Rifle in 6.5 Carcano or Japanese and start shooting XTC again just to show that the CM's innovation, isn't.
The various .32 revolver rounds. . .I'll admit I was kinda tempted when a blue 6" Smith (disremember the model number, but a near clone of a 586) crossed my path, but when you have a number of .357's, several nice molds for them, and a finite supply of S.P.P.'s, the voice that says "WHY?" speaks pretty loudly.
- shotgunshooter3
- Posts: 653
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 4:07 pm
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
I have a S&W 442 that I carry... never... but it's there should I want to. Weighs in at around 15oz if I remember correctly. Shoots pretty well for what it is, I had a range report on the Guns and Ammo Forum. G&A Forum (for the google bots).
https://www.smith-wesson.com/product/j-frame-150544
https://www.smith-wesson.com/product/j-frame-150544
"Speed is the economy of motion" - Scott Jedlinski
-
fisheadgib
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 3:37 am
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
My wife has an lcp and a 638 and she is comfortable with either one. I think that she prefers the lcp as it's a little smaller and lighter but she'll choose which one according to the circumstances. If she's going hiking, kayaking, or traveling, she'll carry the .38 because she knows that it will go bang no matter what. If she's walking up to get the mail or down to feed the horses, she'll stick the lcp in her pocket or hook it on her waistband. (There's a Teknaclip on it.)
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
Some recent perceptions on the scandium Smith snubby: I shot some .38 Heavy Duty loads that are basically +P+ / baby .357's that push 175 grains at about 1030 fps out of a 4" gun. As you'd expect, it's a highly unpleasant thing to fire through the ultra-light revolver, but the interesting thing was the WAY in which it was unpleasant. The spank to the web of the hand was noticeable, but worse was the muzzle lifting so sharply that the triggerguard rose up and battered the bottom of my trigger finger. A NEW kind of pain!
Instead, that gun is going to get a refined version of the British Webley approach - 175 grains with a big meplat chugging out at about 650 fps. Stone axe tech with no sex appeal - just my style!
Instead, that gun is going to get a refined version of the British Webley approach - 175 grains with a big meplat chugging out at about 650 fps. Stone axe tech with no sex appeal - just my style!
WWJMBD?
I believe we should stand on Ceremony. . . while our friends handcuff the sanctimonious little prick and take him away.
I believe we should stand on Ceremony. . . while our friends handcuff the sanctimonious little prick and take him away.
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
Wife meplat is gonna hurtBigslug wrote: ↑Sun Sep 03, 2023 2:04 am Some recent perceptions on the scandium Smith snubby: I shot some .38 Heavy Duty loads that are basically +P+ / baby .357's that push 175 grains at about 1030 fps out of a 4" gun. As you'd expect, it's a highly unpleasant thing to fire through the ultra-light revolver, but the interesting thing was the WAY in which it was unpleasant. The spank to the web of the hand was noticeable, but worse was the muzzle lifting so sharply that the triggerguard rose up and battered the bottom of my trigger finger. A NEW kind of pain!![]()
Instead, that gun is going to get a refined version of the British Webley approach - 175 grains with a big meplat chugging out at about 650 fps. Stone axe tech with no sex appeal - just my style!![]()
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
Diver43 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 03, 2023 11:22 pmWide meplat is gonna hurtBigslug wrote: ↑Sun Sep 03, 2023 2:04 am Some recent perceptions on the scandium Smith snubby: I shot some .38 Heavy Duty loads that are basically +P+ / baby .357's that push 175 grains at about 1030 fps out of a 4" gun. As you'd expect, it's a highly unpleasant thing to fire through the ultra-light revolver, but the interesting thing was the WAY in which it was unpleasant. The spank to the web of the hand was noticeable, but worse was the muzzle lifting so sharply that the triggerguard rose up and battered the bottom of my trigger finger. A NEW kind of pain!![]()
Instead, that gun is going to get a refined version of the British Webley approach - 175 grains with a big meplat chugging out at about 650 fps. Stone axe tech with no sex appeal - just my style!![]()