Springfield 1884
-
JunkCollector
- Posts: 847
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 9:26 am
Springfield 1884
This just turned up.
I've been wanting a 45-70 for probably a decade at least.
Came close several times but never quite hit the right one.
Saw this with what I think is an experimental ram rod bayonet.
Cutting edge tactical right there.
Surprised there is no candle holder attachment.
Looked it over....was pretty wow it's in nice shape.
Checked the bore....dang did they even shoot it.
I did tell him I saw a spider and rust chunks.
He said good.
I'll admit I was totally thrown by the case colored receiver.
I mean who knew it was supposed to be.
I've never seen one anyway.
Oh well here it is.
BTW the sling died the day I had him put it away.
I've been wanting a 45-70 for probably a decade at least.
Came close several times but never quite hit the right one.
Saw this with what I think is an experimental ram rod bayonet.
Cutting edge tactical right there.
Surprised there is no candle holder attachment.
Looked it over....was pretty wow it's in nice shape.
Checked the bore....dang did they even shoot it.
I did tell him I saw a spider and rust chunks.
He said good.
I'll admit I was totally thrown by the case colored receiver.
I mean who knew it was supposed to be.
I've never seen one anyway.
Oh well here it is.
BTW the sling died the day I had him put it away.
- Attachments
-
- 20230803_173657.jpg (1.53 MiB) Viewed 2995 times
-
- 20230803_173258.jpg (2.35 MiB) Viewed 2995 times
-
- 20230803_172259.jpg (2.09 MiB) Viewed 2995 times
-
- 20230803_173413.jpg (1.28 MiB) Viewed 2995 times
-
- 20230803_173021.jpg (1.53 MiB) Viewed 2995 times
-
- 20230803_174516.jpg (1.83 MiB) Viewed 2995 times
-
Wambli Ska
- Posts: 4092
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:09 pm
Re: Springfield 1884
Wow, that’s a beauty!!!!!! 


Re: Springfield 1884
Really nice infantry rifle...
.
.
The 1874 Sharps...The gun that made the west safe for Winchester
-
JunkCollector
- Posts: 847
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 9:26 am
Re: Springfield 1884
beauty!! I have got to get myself one some day.
Re: Springfield 1884
Very Nice they are a blast to shoot
-
JunkCollector
- Posts: 847
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 9:26 am
Re: Springfield 1884
Not my thing. But, still a very cool gun to have. 

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
Re: Springfield 1884
That is a very cool gun!!
Re: Springfield 1884
How cool is that. nice find.
Re: Springfield 1884
SWEET!
Ideally, that'll be the 500 grain round nose bullet you'll want for that one.
https://www.bearcreeksupplybullets.com/45-170-500 Same thing as your rolling block bullets - "coated" but not traditionally lubed.
Ideally, that'll be the 500 grain round nose bullet you'll want for that one.
https://www.bearcreeksupplybullets.com/45-170-500 Same thing as your rolling block bullets - "coated" but not traditionally lubed.
WWJMBD?
I believe we should stand on Ceremony. . . while our friends handcuff the sanctimonious little prick and take him away.
I believe we should stand on Ceremony. . . while our friends handcuff the sanctimonious little prick and take him away.
Re: Springfield 1884
You will be amazed at how great they shoot, and FUN!! I believe that is the 1888 version with the spike bayonet, some of them had hooded front sights, too! They are zeroed for about 250 yards. I put a taller front sight on mine so there are zeroed at 100 yards now. For the rifle I load a .405 cast and 40 grains of 3031. BP equivalent at 1300 fps.
You will find out these rifles are a hoot to shoot!!
You will find out these rifles are a hoot to shoot!!
-
JunkCollector
- Posts: 847
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 9:26 am
Re: Springfield 1884
Your right AL
By the serial it looks like it was made in 1891 which matches the cartouche
By the serial it looks like it was made in 1891 which matches the cartouche
Re: Springfield 1884
Besides the sight, is the 1884 different than the 1873?
Maybe lighter?
Re: Springfield 1884
There's not a lot of difference between the two. The breech was modified a little, and other small upgrades over the years!!They aren't as heavy as they look, and they balance well!! Of course, back then, men were men!! 
Just my opinion, but I think the earlier style sight was a better combat sight! The Buffington sight was more of a target sight, similar to the sight on an '03 Springfield. A little to complicated for fast target acquisition!! But Col. Buffington was the commander of the Army target shooting team!!
Just my opinion, but I think the earlier style sight was a better combat sight! The Buffington sight was more of a target sight, similar to the sight on an '03 Springfield. A little to complicated for fast target acquisition!! But Col. Buffington was the commander of the Army target shooting team!!
Re: Springfield 1884
But I said it with a smile!! 
-
JunkCollector
- Posts: 847
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 9:26 am
-
DanielChamberlain
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2023 3:24 pm
Re: Springfield 1884
Had one someone had turned into a carbine sometime in the past. The trapdoor and all the metal was pristine. Color case flawless. No pits, no rust, no blemishes at all. The stock was in "ceremonial" condition. Since it wasn't stock and someone had mounted a ramp style hunting sight on it, I got it for about 80 bucks in the mid 70s. Shot well. Carried well. Never got around to hunting with it. Someone offered me a hundred more than I paid for it, so it went out the door...
-
JunkCollector
- Posts: 847
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 9:26 am
Re: Springfield 1884
Hey Dan
I got offered one cheap a year or so ago.
It sounds similar it's sights were probably worth his asking price.
I got offered one cheap a year or so ago.
It sounds similar it's sights were probably worth his asking price.