Springfield 1884

General firearm discussions that do not fit in our specific firearm-related forums.
Post Reply
JunkCollector
Posts: 847
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 9:26 am

Springfield 1884

Post by JunkCollector »

This just turned up.
I've been wanting a 45-70 for probably a decade at least.
Came close several times but never quite hit the right one.

Saw this with what I think is an experimental ram rod bayonet.
Cutting edge tactical right there.
Surprised there is no candle holder attachment.

Looked it over....was pretty wow it's in nice shape.
Checked the bore....dang did they even shoot it.

I did tell him I saw a spider and rust chunks.
He said good.

I'll admit I was totally thrown by the case colored receiver.
I mean who knew it was supposed to be.
I've never seen one anyway.

Oh well here it is.
BTW the sling died the day I had him put it away.
Attachments
20230803_173657.jpg
20230803_173657.jpg (1.53 MiB) Viewed 2995 times
20230803_173258.jpg
20230803_173258.jpg (2.35 MiB) Viewed 2995 times
20230803_172259.jpg
20230803_172259.jpg (2.09 MiB) Viewed 2995 times
20230803_173413.jpg
20230803_173413.jpg (1.28 MiB) Viewed 2995 times
20230803_173021.jpg
20230803_173021.jpg (1.53 MiB) Viewed 2995 times
20230803_174516.jpg
20230803_174516.jpg (1.83 MiB) Viewed 2995 times
Wambli Ska
Posts: 4092
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:09 pm

Re: Springfield 1884

Post by Wambli Ska »

Wow, that’s a beauty!!!!!! ❤️❤️❤️
Jayhawker
Posts: 390
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 2:16 pm

Re: Springfield 1884

Post by Jayhawker »

Really nice infantry rifle...

.
The 1874 Sharps...The gun that made the west safe for Winchester
JunkCollector
Posts: 847
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 9:26 am

Re: Springfield 1884

Post by JunkCollector »

Jayhawker wrote: Thu Aug 03, 2023 10:35 pm Really nice infantry rifle...

.
I would not have liked lugging this around.
sakodude
Posts: 840
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 2:32 am

Re: Springfield 1884

Post by sakodude »

beauty!! I have got to get myself one some day.
Diver43
Posts: 1260
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 4:16 am

Re: Springfield 1884

Post by Diver43 »

Very Nice they are a blast to shoot
JunkCollector
Posts: 847
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 9:26 am

Re: Springfield 1884

Post by JunkCollector »

Diver43 wrote: Fri Aug 04, 2023 1:14 am Very Nice they are a blast to shoot
I hope so.
I've Never shot one or a 45-70 anything but if it's not raining I'll remedy that tomorrow.

This one warrants some research it appears by the cartouche and serial to have been made in 1891
User avatar
Zee
Posts: 2760
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 2:23 pm

Re: Springfield 1884

Post by Zee »

Not my thing. But, still a very cool gun to have. 👍🏻👍🏻
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
Elk Creek
Posts: 1627
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2023 2:01 pm

Re: Springfield 1884

Post by Elk Creek »

That is a very cool gun!!
User avatar
rberg
Posts: 213
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 4:25 am

Re: Springfield 1884

Post by rberg »

How cool is that. nice find.
User avatar
Bigslug
Posts: 1163
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 3:28 am

Re: Springfield 1884

Post by Bigslug »

SWEET!

Ideally, that'll be the 500 grain round nose bullet you'll want for that one.

https://www.bearcreeksupplybullets.com/45-170-500 Same thing as your rolling block bullets - "coated" but not traditionally lubed.
WWJMBD?

I believe we should stand on Ceremony. . . while our friends handcuff the sanctimonious little prick and take him away.
Big Al1
Posts: 339
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 1:42 pm

Re: Springfield 1884

Post by Big Al1 »

You will be amazed at how great they shoot, and FUN!! I believe that is the 1888 version with the spike bayonet, some of them had hooded front sights, too! They are zeroed for about 250 yards. I put a taller front sight on mine so there are zeroed at 100 yards now. For the rifle I load a .405 cast and 40 grains of 3031. BP equivalent at 1300 fps.
You will find out these rifles are a hoot to shoot!!
JunkCollector
Posts: 847
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 9:26 am

Re: Springfield 1884

Post by JunkCollector »

Your right AL
By the serial it looks like it was made in 1891 which matches the cartouche
Diver43
Posts: 1260
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 4:16 am

Re: Springfield 1884

Post by Diver43 »

JunkCollector wrote: Thu Aug 03, 2023 11:02 pm
Jayhawker wrote: Thu Aug 03, 2023 10:35 pm Really nice infantry rifle...

.
I would not have liked lugging this around.
Besides the sight, is the 1884 different than the 1873?
Maybe lighter?
Big Al1
Posts: 339
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 1:42 pm

Re: Springfield 1884

Post by Big Al1 »

There's not a lot of difference between the two. The breech was modified a little, and other small upgrades over the years!!They aren't as heavy as they look, and they balance well!! Of course, back then, men were men!! :D

Just my opinion, but I think the earlier style sight was a better combat sight! The Buffington sight was more of a target sight, similar to the sight on an '03 Springfield. A little to complicated for fast target acquisition!! But Col. Buffington was the commander of the Army target shooting team!!
Freezer
Posts: 910
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2023 9:51 am

Re: Springfield 1884

Post by Freezer »

Big Al1 wrote: Fri Aug 04, 2023 9:59 pm They aren't as heavy as they look, and they balance well!! Of course, back then, men were men!! :D

You're beginning to sound like HvyMax :shock:
Big Al1
Posts: 339
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 1:42 pm

Re: Springfield 1884

Post by Big Al1 »

But I said it with a smile!! :D
JunkCollector
Posts: 847
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 9:26 am

Re: Springfield 1884

Post by JunkCollector »

Big Al1 wrote: Sat Aug 05, 2023 1:26 pm But I said it with a smile!! :D
I noticed AL
I've reached a low point it seems
Hopefully I can find some mild rounds
DanielChamberlain
Posts: 154
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2023 3:24 pm

Re: Springfield 1884

Post by DanielChamberlain »

Had one someone had turned into a carbine sometime in the past. The trapdoor and all the metal was pristine. Color case flawless. No pits, no rust, no blemishes at all. The stock was in "ceremonial" condition. Since it wasn't stock and someone had mounted a ramp style hunting sight on it, I got it for about 80 bucks in the mid 70s. Shot well. Carried well. Never got around to hunting with it. Someone offered me a hundred more than I paid for it, so it went out the door...
JunkCollector
Posts: 847
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 9:26 am

Re: Springfield 1884

Post by JunkCollector »

Hey Dan
I got offered one cheap a year or so ago.
It sounds similar it's sights were probably worth his asking price.
Post Reply