Shooting at the WHCD
Shooting at the WHCD
The White House Correspondents Dinner was cancelled after someone opened fire. The Trumps hadn't entered the dining area yet.
"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it." - Samuel Clemens (aka Mark Twain)
Re: Shooting at the WHCD
Can we ask the libs to Just Stop Shooting at us?
-
Wambli Ska
- Posts: 3972
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:09 pm
- bullsi1911
- Posts: 1211
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 1:46 pm
- Location: Austin By God Texas
Re: Shooting at the WHCD
Is it too soon for memes about this?
To make something simple is a thousand times more difficult than to make something complex.
-Mikhail Kalashnikov
AKA ‘Admin’
-Mikhail Kalashnikov
AKA ‘Admin’
- bullsi1911
- Posts: 1211
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 1:46 pm
- Location: Austin By God Texas
Re: Shooting at the WHCD
To make something simple is a thousand times more difficult than to make something complex.
-Mikhail Kalashnikov
AKA ‘Admin’
-Mikhail Kalashnikov
AKA ‘Admin’
Re: Shooting at the WHCD
It’s NEVER too early for memes.
“The shepherd slaughters more of the flock than the wolf ever will.”
-
Zsarvashere
- Posts: 303
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2023 4:30 pm
Re: Shooting at the WHCD
The buster scruggs reference is top notch. It brought a smile.
Re: Shooting at the WHCD
Just have to hang a "no guns allowed" sign at all of the entrances....
I take no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but rather that they turn away from their ways and live. Eze 33:11
Re: Shooting at the WHCD
"A shotgun, a handgun, and multiple knives. . ."
OK. . .so he travels light.
OK. . .so he travels light.
WWJMBD?
I believe we should stand on Ceremony. . . while our friends handcuff the sanctimonious little prick and take him away.
I believe we should stand on Ceremony. . . while our friends handcuff the sanctimonious little prick and take him away.
- bullsi1911
- Posts: 1211
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 1:46 pm
- Location: Austin By God Texas
Re: Shooting at the WHCD
I just read online that the “Leeeroy Jenkins!” assassin was toting a Mavrick 88 and an Armscor/RIA .38. Obviously a well funded operation
To make something simple is a thousand times more difficult than to make something complex.
-Mikhail Kalashnikov
AKA ‘Admin’
-Mikhail Kalashnikov
AKA ‘Admin’
-
Wambli Ska
- Posts: 3972
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:09 pm
Re: Shooting at the WHCD
Uuuuuuuf, top operator…bullsi1911 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 27, 2026 2:23 am I just read online that the “Leeeroy Jenkins!” assassin was toting a Mavrick 88 and an Armscor/RIA .38. Obviously a well funded operation
Re: Shooting at the WHCD
It was a 38 super 1911! 
-
Wambli Ska
- Posts: 3972
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:09 pm
Re: Shooting at the WHCD
So they showed the whole set of weapons. Extra rounds attached to the “Tactical” Maverick with Velcro, a bunch of cheap gun show Chinese “throwing” knives and an RIA 1911 with two extra mags. So, that’s what he was planning on taking a large contingent of SS and other LE Personal with.
Then again the USSS send 5 rounds his way and connected zero times sooooo…
Then again the USSS send 5 rounds his way and connected zero times sooooo…
-
Zsarvashere
- Posts: 303
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2023 4:30 pm
Re: Shooting at the WHCD
Not only did they not connect with him, looks like they made a special connection with themselves. Begs the question....
Who was more incompetent?
Who was more incompetent?
Re: Shooting at the WHCD
Seems like time at the range would serve the usss very well.
-
Wambli Ska
- Posts: 3972
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:09 pm
Re: Shooting at the WHCD
But to be fair I saw the video of this guy running through the checkpoint and he looked like
Re: Shooting at the WHCD
Shouldn’t have even got to the checkpoint. You’ve got the leader of the free world and his successors IN THE SAME ROOM and some limp wristed douchebag gets through? Had it been a high speed low drag operator type, or an orchestrated attack with multiple people, it would have been a bad deal.Wambli Ska wrote: ↑Wed Apr 29, 2026 11:57 pm But to be fair I saw the video of this guy running through the checkpoint and he looked like
IMG_0875.jpeg
Not saying it was a planned right wing conspiracy, and not saying they allowed it to happen. I’m just having a hard time believing the security was that lax, especially in light of the two previous assassination attempts.
“The shepherd slaughters more of the flock than the wolf ever will.”
Re: Shooting at the WHCD
When you do the same thing day after day, you have to fight complacency.
I can say that me and my guys weren’t there. So, you had the run of the mill jack wagons there who earn a paycheck. Complacent.
I can say that me and my guys weren’t there. So, you had the run of the mill jack wagons there who earn a paycheck. Complacent.
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
Re: Shooting at the WHCD
Every day you go to work is a day to fudge up or do right.
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
Re: Shooting at the WHCD
Wasn't there, ut it seems those being protected didn't hear the gun shots, so they either have great soundproofing or the idiot didn't even get closeCPJ 2.0 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 30, 2026 12:36 amShouldn’t have even got to the checkpoint. You’ve got the leader of the free world and his successors IN THE SAME ROOM and some limp wristed douchebag gets through? Had it been a high speed low drag operator type, or an orchestrated attack with multiple people, it would have been a bad deal.Wambli Ska wrote: ↑Wed Apr 29, 2026 11:57 pm But to be fair I saw the video of this guy running through the checkpoint and he looked like
IMG_0875.jpeg
Not saying it was a planned right wing conspiracy, and not saying they allowed it to happen. I’m just having a hard time believing the security was that lax, especially in light of the two previous assassination attempts.
Re: Shooting at the WHCD
Way back in the day there was a video of prisoners doing “exercises” in prep for a running attack on a guard. So our firearms team being what they were rigged up an automatic target return to simulate the speed of someone running at you with a weapon. That poop flat rattles some of our guys. The team saw that and the whole department got an extra week of firearms training. Hitting a target coming at you out of a holster is a challenge, but not insurmountable.
- breamfisher
- Posts: 752
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 10:11 pm
Re: Shooting at the WHCD
News has been replaying the video of the guy running the checkpoint. Yeah, he's fast. But what I keep noticing is that as he's running, it seems like only 1 person is looking in the direction people should be coming from, the rest are occupied with tasks or talking. Once he's through, the other 5 or 6 people who weren't paying attention but were armed had their guns out, and another 4 or so are getting out of the way.CPJ 2.0 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 30, 2026 12:36 amShouldn’t have even got to the checkpoint. You’ve got the leader of the free world and his successors IN THE SAME ROOM and some limp wristed douchebag gets through? Had it been a high speed low drag operator type, or an orchestrated attack with multiple people, it would have been a bad deal.Wambli Ska wrote: ↑Wed Apr 29, 2026 11:57 pm But to be fair I saw the video of this guy running through the checkpoint and he looked like
IMG_0875.jpeg
Not saying it was a planned right wing conspiracy, and not saying they allowed it to happen. I’m just having a hard time believing the security was that lax, especially in light of the two previous assassination attempts.
Looks like Zee's statement about complacency has some truth.
9mm kills the body, but .45 ACP destroys the soul!
-a Fudd, probably
-a Fudd, probably
Re: Shooting at the WHCD
I think complacency has to be built into the defense mechanism, at least to a degree. You can't be razor sharp, all the time, day after day, when NOTHING happens, and all the sheep around you really are sheep. A thin perimeter tends to assume that perimeter is going to be airtight, and it won't be if it's made out of bored humans.
World War 1 had a lot of bored humans, but the perimeters were practically impenetrable because they had a lot of depth to them. If you have one sleepy slap-**** watching a stretch of barbed wire, the enemy will eventually sneak through. If you have ten slap-dicks watching the same stretch of wire, and have another ten slap-dicks randomly bombarding it with artillery, the enemy will have to get MUCH more creative.
It's not practical to weed out slap-dickery in such settings - - it needs to be integrated.
World War 1 had a lot of bored humans, but the perimeters were practically impenetrable because they had a lot of depth to them. If you have one sleepy slap-**** watching a stretch of barbed wire, the enemy will eventually sneak through. If you have ten slap-dicks watching the same stretch of wire, and have another ten slap-dicks randomly bombarding it with artillery, the enemy will have to get MUCH more creative.
It's not practical to weed out slap-dickery in such settings - - it needs to be integrated.
WWJMBD?
I believe we should stand on Ceremony. . . while our friends handcuff the sanctimonious little prick and take him away.
I believe we should stand on Ceremony. . . while our friends handcuff the sanctimonious little prick and take him away.
Re: Shooting at the WHCD
Bigslug wrote: ↑Fri May 01, 2026 1:31 pm I think complacency has to be built into the defense mechanism, at least to a degree. You can't be razor sharp, all the time, day after day, when NOTHING happens, and all the sheep around you really are sheep. A thin perimeter tends to assume that perimeter is going to be airtight, and it won't be if it's made out of bored humans.
World War 1 had a lot of bored humans, but the perimeters were practically impenetrable because they had a lot of depth to them. If you have one sleepy slap-**** watching a stretch of barbed wire, the enemy will eventually sneak through. If you have ten slap-dicks watching the same stretch of wire, and have another ten slap-dicks randomly bombarding it with artillery, the enemy will have to get MUCH more creative.
It's not practical to weed out slap-dickery in such settings - - it needs to be integrated.
That is 100% complete bullcrap.
Complacent and guarding the most powerful people in the WORLD don’t go together in the same sentence, let alone the same dictionary. There’s zero room for complacency at the top level of high speed low drag operator types.
We aren’t talking about the lardass cops that the only thing they can outrun is a donut. Secret Service. Guarding the POTUS.
“The shepherd slaughters more of the flock than the wolf ever will.”