Lite weight .38 snubbie?

Discuss weapons, tactics, and all topics related to self-defense.
User avatar
Zorba
Posts: 214
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 3:43 am

Lite weight .38 snubbie?

Post by Zorba »

Wife is complaining about her Charter Arms for (off body) carry. It weighs about 1 lb, 4 oz unloaded. She's wanting to shop for something lighter. The Ruger LCR is 13.5 oz, and the Smith 642 is 14.6. Any others she should be looking at?
"If you get it and didn't work for it, someone else worked for it and didn't get it..."

)O(
fisheadgib
Posts: 162
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 3:37 am

Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?

Post by fisheadgib »

If you go to the lcr, which is as light as you're going to get, she'll bitch about the recoil. You're not going to win.
User avatar
Chiro1989
Posts: 1417
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 2:35 am

Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?

Post by Chiro1989 »

Recoil is snappy in my S&W 642 and my Ruger LCR, she should try before she buys
I take no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but rather that they turn away from their ways and live. Eze 33:11
User avatar
Gila
Posts: 422
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 3:38 am

Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?

Post by Gila »

I have a S&W Airlite 340PD .357 that weighs a little over half a pound unloaded. It is extremely painful to fire a magnum round in it. If you can find someone who has one and let her try a .38 round in it to compare with what she now has it should stop her whining.
No good deed goes unpunished.
User avatar
Zorba
Posts: 214
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 3:43 am

Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?

Post by Zorba »

Chiro1989 wrote: Thu Aug 17, 2023 3:49 am Recoil is snappy in my S&W 642 and my Ruger LCR, she should try before she buys
Agreed. She's not particularly recoil shy, but I did point out to her that a liteweight would recoil sharper.
"If you get it and didn't work for it, someone else worked for it and didn't get it..."

)O(
User avatar
Zorba
Posts: 214
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 3:43 am

Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?

Post by Zorba »

fisheadgib wrote: Thu Aug 17, 2023 3:14 am If you go to the lcr, which is as light as you're going to get, she'll bitch about the recoil. You're not going to win.
Fortunately, NOT my problem. We may be able to rent an LCR at a local range...
"If you get it and didn't work for it, someone else worked for it and didn't get it..."

)O(
User avatar
Zorba
Posts: 214
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 3:43 am

Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?

Post by Zorba »

Gila wrote: Thu Aug 17, 2023 4:36 am I have a S&W Airlite 340PD .357 that weighs a little over half a pound unloaded. It is extremely painful to fire a magnum round in it. If you can find someone who has one and let her try a .38 round in it to compare with what she now has it should stop her whining.
Very expensive too!
"If you get it and didn't work for it, someone else worked for it and didn't get it..."

)O(
User avatar
Bigslug
Posts: 972
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 3:28 am

Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?

Post by Bigslug »

No real complaints against the LCR, but the Smiths will have more available options for grips.

The scandium Smiths are expensive and unpleasant to shoot with the hotter stuff, but they DO give you the versatility of shooting .357 if needed. The 642 is the middle ground.

Winchester is now loading their standard pressure 130 grain FMJ with a fairly aggressive flat point. Much like the .380, a lot of the .38 hollowpoints are pretty marginal for penetration when you compromise the velocity with a 2" barrel, so non-expansion may be a better bet. That load would probably be high on my list for a lightweight revolver.
WWJMBD?

Those who study history are destined to lose their minds watching those who don't repeat it.
User avatar
breamfisher
Posts: 684
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 10:11 pm

Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?

Post by breamfisher »

In a J-frame or similar-sized and -weight revolver, I'm leaning more and more towards a 158 gr. LSWC at standard pressures. Decent penetration, recoil's not a bear, caliber-sized wound channel. I'm basing this on my shooting experience with my handloads on a vintage Smith and Wesson Airweight, so others mileage may vary.

Something akin to this in factory form:
https://www.remington.com/handgun/perfo ... 22271.html
9mm kills the body, but .45 ACP destroys the soul!
-a Fudd, probably
User avatar
Zee
Posts: 2261
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 2:23 pm

Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?

Post by Zee »

I tried to fire a cylinder of +P .38 Spl through a Smith 442 I once owned and locked up the cylinder after 3 shots. Just FYI.
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
User avatar
bullsi1911
Posts: 1069
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 1:46 pm
Location: Austin By God Texas

Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?

Post by bullsi1911 »

If you can rent first, that will be a great way to weed down the options. Make sure to bring her charter and fire it before and between the Ruger and the Smith as a “baseline” comparison.

I can tell you if I was going for the LCR, I would be looking at the 9mm version for cheaper ammo:
https://ruger.com/products/lcr/specSheets/5456.html
To make something simple is a thousand times more difficult than to make something complex.
-Mikhail Kalashnikov

AKA ‘Admin’
User avatar
CPJ 2.0
Posts: 3382
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 1:57 pm

Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?

Post by CPJ 2.0 »

bullsi1911 wrote: Thu Aug 17, 2023 2:40 pm If you can rent first, that will be a great way to weed down the options. Make sure to bring her charter and fire it before and between the Ruger and the Smith as a “baseline” comparison.

I can tell you if I was going for the LCR, I would be looking at the 9mm version for cheaper ammo:
https://ruger.com/products/lcr/specSheets/5456.html
I was, WAS mildly interested.

https://www.budsgunshop.com/product_inf ... 875+blk+ss



fudge that poop.
“The shepherd slaughters more of the flock than the wolf ever will.”
User avatar
Zorba
Posts: 214
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 3:43 am

Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?

Post by Zorba »

bullsi1911 wrote: Thu Aug 17, 2023 2:40 pm If you can rent first, that will be a great way to weed down the options. Make sure to bring her charter and fire it before and between the Ruger and the Smith as a “baseline” comparison.

I can tell you if I was going for the LCR, I would be looking at the 9mm version for cheaper ammo:
https://ruger.com/products/lcr/specSheets/5456.html
One word: Moon Clips. That would not be a good match with my wife! Great idea about bringing the Charter for comparison.
"If you get it and didn't work for it, someone else worked for it and didn't get it..."

)O(
Wambli Ska
Posts: 3075
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:09 pm

Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?

Post by Wambli Ska »

Is she really married to the revolver??? This must get be a good time to steer her towards a small 9mm pistol. Just a suggestion. Just about every woman I’ve trained has ended up living the Glock 43X. I’ve probably sold more than the local sales rep and have gotten no commissions 🤣
Wambli Ska
Posts: 3075
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:09 pm

Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?

Post by Wambli Ska »

And if recoil of the .38 is a concern how about a .22 WMR?
https://www.nrawomen.com/content/do-22- ... f-defense/
User avatar
Zorba
Posts: 214
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 3:43 am

Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?

Post by Zorba »

Wambli Ska wrote: Thu Aug 17, 2023 5:12 pm Is she really married to the revolver??? This must get be a good time to steer her towards a small 9mm pistol. Just a suggestion. Just about every woman I’ve trained has ended up living the Glock 43X. I’ve probably sold more than the local sales rep and have gotten no commissions 🤣
Like I say, she's not particularly recoil shy. But she is semi-auto shy. She does NOT like them - for whatever reason, she doesn't like the flying brass. She's a lefty, and the brass flies across her field of view. I even had her try my P.38 which ejects left instead of right. "Better, but I still don't like it." It is what it is. She also has problems racking the slide - I've pointed out that there are some available that either have lite racking slides or tip-up barrels negating the need. She "might" go for one of those, but probably not...

So yea, she's pretty married to a revolver - like many are married to facebook and smartphones. *shrug*
"If you get it and didn't work for it, someone else worked for it and didn't get it..."

)O(
User avatar
CPJ 2.0
Posts: 3382
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 1:57 pm

Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?

Post by CPJ 2.0 »

Zorba wrote: Thu Aug 17, 2023 4:02 pm
bullsi1911 wrote: Thu Aug 17, 2023 2:40 pm If you can rent first, that will be a great way to weed down the options. Make sure to bring her charter and fire it before and between the Ruger and the Smith as a “baseline” comparison.

I can tell you if I was going for the LCR, I would be looking at the 9mm version for cheaper ammo:
https://ruger.com/products/lcr/specSheets/5456.html
One word: Moon Clips. That would not be a good match with my wife! Great idea about bringing the Charter for comparison.
Is she against ease of use and efficiency?
“The shepherd slaughters more of the flock than the wolf ever will.”
Diver43
Posts: 1065
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 4:16 am

Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?

Post by Diver43 »

Up until the recent change to a SW Shield EZ in .380, my wife carried a SW 431 PD in .32 H&R Mag. She had no issue shooting it, just bad the revolver because of hand strength and racking the slide of a semi auto. The EZ negates that issue.
User avatar
breamfisher
Posts: 684
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 10:11 pm

Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?

Post by breamfisher »

I thought the EZ was a gimmick. A friend bought their wife an Equalizer. Holy cow, that thing is easy to manipulate!
9mm kills the body, but .45 ACP destroys the soul!
-a Fudd, probably
User avatar
Gila
Posts: 422
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 3:38 am

Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?

Post by Gila »

Zorba wrote: Thu Aug 17, 2023 5:32 am
Gila wrote: Thu Aug 17, 2023 4:36 am I have a S&W Airlite 340PD .357 that weighs a little over half a pound unloaded. It is extremely painful to fire a magnum round in it. If you can find someone who has one and let her try a .38 round in it to compare with what she now has it should stop her whining.
Very expensive too!
How much is your wife's or your life worth? My S&W has never failed, it is extremely concealable (I carry mine in my boot), accurate at defensive distances and has very good stopping power. My wife carried basically the same revolver, but with an aluminum frame and in .38 Plus P. At the range we learned that she had no more difficultly shooting the Plus P than the standard .38. Her revolver is no longer made, but is the same as the Lightweight 642, except for the caliber, which is now .38 Special.
No good deed goes unpunished.
User avatar
CPJ 2.0
Posts: 3382
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 1:57 pm

Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?

Post by CPJ 2.0 »

Gila wrote: Thu Aug 17, 2023 10:43 pm
Zorba wrote: Thu Aug 17, 2023 5:32 am
Gila wrote: Thu Aug 17, 2023 4:36 am I have a S&W Airlite 340PD .357 that weighs a little over half a pound unloaded. It is extremely painful to fire a magnum round in it. If you can find someone who has one and let her try a .38 round in it to compare with what she now has it should stop her whining.
Very expensive too!
How much is your wife's or your life worth? My S&W has never failed, it is extremely concealable (I carry mine in my boot), accurate at defensive distances and has very good stopping power. My wife carried basically the same revolver, but with an aluminum frame and in .38 Plus P. At the range we learned that she had no more difficultly shooting the Plus P than the standard .38. Her revolver is no longer made, but is the same as the Lightweight 642, except for the caliber, which is now .38 Special.
Define: stopping power.
“The shepherd slaughters more of the flock than the wolf ever will.”
User avatar
jbp-ohio
Posts: 1052
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 2:55 pm

Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?

Post by jbp-ohio »

PD38HS3H__65331.jpg
PD38HS3H__65331.jpg (319.44 KiB) Viewed 2930 times
Kansashunter
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2023 12:38 am

Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?

Post by Kansashunter »

Zorba is her charter arms SA/DA or DA only? I have a 642 and I have difficulty shooting it well between the DA trigger and a 2 inch barrel. It would be fine for up close and personal for me bit I haven't been comfortable enough with it to carry it. I understand about getting a wife to carry something can be difficult.
User avatar
Zorba
Posts: 214
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 3:43 am

Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?

Post by Zorba »

Kansashunter wrote: Fri Aug 18, 2023 2:32 am Zorba is her charter arms SA/DA or DA only? I have a 642 and I have difficulty shooting it well between the DA trigger and a 2 inch barrel. It would be fine for up close and personal for me bit I haven't been comfortable enough with it to carry it. I understand about getting a wife to carry something can be difficult.
DA only - which is what she prefers. She doesn't have a problem shooting it - quite the opposite actually - she just finds it too heavy for carry and is looking for options.
"If you get it and didn't work for it, someone else worked for it and didn't get it..."

)O(
User avatar
Gila
Posts: 422
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 3:38 am

Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?

Post by Gila »

CPJ 2.0 wrote: Thu Aug 17, 2023 11:06 pm
Gila wrote: Thu Aug 17, 2023 10:43 pm
Zorba wrote: Thu Aug 17, 2023 5:32 am

Very expensive too!
How much is your wife's or your life worth? My S&W has never failed, it is extremely concealable (I carry mine in my boot), accurate at defensive distances and has very good stopping power. My wife carried basically the same revolver, but with an aluminum frame and in .38 Plus P. At the range we learned that she had no more difficultly shooting the Plus P than the standard .38. Her revolver is no longer made, but is the same as the Lightweight 642, except for the caliber, which is now .38 Special.
Define: stopping power.
A 125 grain Golden Saber .357 magnum.
No good deed goes unpunished.
Post Reply