Lite weight .38 snubbie?
Lite weight .38 snubbie?
Wife is complaining about her Charter Arms for (off body) carry. It weighs about 1 lb, 4 oz unloaded. She's wanting to shop for something lighter. The Ruger LCR is 13.5 oz, and the Smith 642 is 14.6. Any others she should be looking at?
"If you get it and didn't work for it, someone else worked for it and didn't get it..."
)O(
)O(
-
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 3:37 am
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
If you go to the lcr, which is as light as you're going to get, she'll bitch about the recoil. You're not going to win.
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
Recoil is snappy in my S&W 642 and my Ruger LCR, she should try before she buys
I take no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but rather that they turn away from their ways and live. Eze 33:11
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
I have a S&W Airlite 340PD .357 that weighs a little over half a pound unloaded. It is extremely painful to fire a magnum round in it. If you can find someone who has one and let her try a .38 round in it to compare with what she now has it should stop her whining.
No good deed goes unpunished.
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
Agreed. She's not particularly recoil shy, but I did point out to her that a liteweight would recoil sharper.
"If you get it and didn't work for it, someone else worked for it and didn't get it..."
)O(
)O(
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
Fortunately, NOT my problem. We may be able to rent an LCR at a local range...fisheadgib wrote: ↑Thu Aug 17, 2023 3:14 am If you go to the lcr, which is as light as you're going to get, she'll bitch about the recoil. You're not going to win.
"If you get it and didn't work for it, someone else worked for it and didn't get it..."
)O(
)O(
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
Very expensive too!Gila wrote: ↑Thu Aug 17, 2023 4:36 am I have a S&W Airlite 340PD .357 that weighs a little over half a pound unloaded. It is extremely painful to fire a magnum round in it. If you can find someone who has one and let her try a .38 round in it to compare with what she now has it should stop her whining.
"If you get it and didn't work for it, someone else worked for it and didn't get it..."
)O(
)O(
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
No real complaints against the LCR, but the Smiths will have more available options for grips.
The scandium Smiths are expensive and unpleasant to shoot with the hotter stuff, but they DO give you the versatility of shooting .357 if needed. The 642 is the middle ground.
Winchester is now loading their standard pressure 130 grain FMJ with a fairly aggressive flat point. Much like the .380, a lot of the .38 hollowpoints are pretty marginal for penetration when you compromise the velocity with a 2" barrel, so non-expansion may be a better bet. That load would probably be high on my list for a lightweight revolver.
The scandium Smiths are expensive and unpleasant to shoot with the hotter stuff, but they DO give you the versatility of shooting .357 if needed. The 642 is the middle ground.
Winchester is now loading their standard pressure 130 grain FMJ with a fairly aggressive flat point. Much like the .380, a lot of the .38 hollowpoints are pretty marginal for penetration when you compromise the velocity with a 2" barrel, so non-expansion may be a better bet. That load would probably be high on my list for a lightweight revolver.
WWJMBD?
Those who study history are destined to lose their minds watching those who don't repeat it.
Those who study history are destined to lose their minds watching those who don't repeat it.
- breamfisher
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 10:11 pm
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
In a J-frame or similar-sized and -weight revolver, I'm leaning more and more towards a 158 gr. LSWC at standard pressures. Decent penetration, recoil's not a bear, caliber-sized wound channel. I'm basing this on my shooting experience with my handloads on a vintage Smith and Wesson Airweight, so others mileage may vary.
Something akin to this in factory form:
https://www.remington.com/handgun/perfo ... 22271.html
Something akin to this in factory form:
https://www.remington.com/handgun/perfo ... 22271.html
9mm kills the body, but .45 ACP destroys the soul!
-a Fudd, probably
-a Fudd, probably
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
I tried to fire a cylinder of +P .38 Spl through a Smith 442 I once owned and locked up the cylinder after 3 shots. Just FYI.
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- bullsi1911
- Posts: 1069
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 1:46 pm
- Location: Austin By God Texas
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
If you can rent first, that will be a great way to weed down the options. Make sure to bring her charter and fire it before and between the Ruger and the Smith as a “baseline” comparison.
I can tell you if I was going for the LCR, I would be looking at the 9mm version for cheaper ammo:
https://ruger.com/products/lcr/specSheets/5456.html
I can tell you if I was going for the LCR, I would be looking at the 9mm version for cheaper ammo:
https://ruger.com/products/lcr/specSheets/5456.html
To make something simple is a thousand times more difficult than to make something complex.
-Mikhail Kalashnikov
AKA ‘Admin’
-Mikhail Kalashnikov
AKA ‘Admin’
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
I was, WAS mildly interested.bullsi1911 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 17, 2023 2:40 pm If you can rent first, that will be a great way to weed down the options. Make sure to bring her charter and fire it before and between the Ruger and the Smith as a “baseline” comparison.
I can tell you if I was going for the LCR, I would be looking at the 9mm version for cheaper ammo:
https://ruger.com/products/lcr/specSheets/5456.html
https://www.budsgunshop.com/product_inf ... 875+blk+ss
fudge that poop.
“The shepherd slaughters more of the flock than the wolf ever will.”
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
One word: Moon Clips. That would not be a good match with my wife! Great idea about bringing the Charter for comparison.bullsi1911 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 17, 2023 2:40 pm If you can rent first, that will be a great way to weed down the options. Make sure to bring her charter and fire it before and between the Ruger and the Smith as a “baseline” comparison.
I can tell you if I was going for the LCR, I would be looking at the 9mm version for cheaper ammo:
https://ruger.com/products/lcr/specSheets/5456.html
"If you get it and didn't work for it, someone else worked for it and didn't get it..."
)O(
)O(
-
- Posts: 3075
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:09 pm
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
Is she really married to the revolver??? This must get be a good time to steer her towards a small 9mm pistol. Just a suggestion. Just about every woman I’ve trained has ended up living the Glock 43X. I’ve probably sold more than the local sales rep and have gotten no commissions 
-
- Posts: 3075
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:09 pm
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
And if recoil of the .38 is a concern how about a .22 WMR?
https://www.nrawomen.com/content/do-22- ... f-defense/
https://www.nrawomen.com/content/do-22- ... f-defense/
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
Like I say, she's not particularly recoil shy. But she is semi-auto shy. She does NOT like them - for whatever reason, she doesn't like the flying brass. She's a lefty, and the brass flies across her field of view. I even had her try my P.38 which ejects left instead of right. "Better, but I still don't like it." It is what it is. She also has problems racking the slide - I've pointed out that there are some available that either have lite racking slides or tip-up barrels negating the need. She "might" go for one of those, but probably not...Wambli Ska wrote: ↑Thu Aug 17, 2023 5:12 pm Is she really married to the revolver??? This must get be a good time to steer her towards a small 9mm pistol. Just a suggestion. Just about every woman I’ve trained has ended up living the Glock 43X. I’ve probably sold more than the local sales rep and have gotten no commissions![]()
So yea, she's pretty married to a revolver - like many are married to facebook and smartphones. *shrug*
"If you get it and didn't work for it, someone else worked for it and didn't get it..."
)O(
)O(
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
Is she against ease of use and efficiency?Zorba wrote: ↑Thu Aug 17, 2023 4:02 pmOne word: Moon Clips. That would not be a good match with my wife! Great idea about bringing the Charter for comparison.bullsi1911 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 17, 2023 2:40 pm If you can rent first, that will be a great way to weed down the options. Make sure to bring her charter and fire it before and between the Ruger and the Smith as a “baseline” comparison.
I can tell you if I was going for the LCR, I would be looking at the 9mm version for cheaper ammo:
https://ruger.com/products/lcr/specSheets/5456.html
“The shepherd slaughters more of the flock than the wolf ever will.”
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
Up until the recent change to a SW Shield EZ in .380, my wife carried a SW 431 PD in .32 H&R Mag. She had no issue shooting it, just bad the revolver because of hand strength and racking the slide of a semi auto. The EZ negates that issue.
- breamfisher
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2023 10:11 pm
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
I thought the EZ was a gimmick. A friend bought their wife an Equalizer. Holy cow, that thing is easy to manipulate!
9mm kills the body, but .45 ACP destroys the soul!
-a Fudd, probably
-a Fudd, probably
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
How much is your wife's or your life worth? My S&W has never failed, it is extremely concealable (I carry mine in my boot), accurate at defensive distances and has very good stopping power. My wife carried basically the same revolver, but with an aluminum frame and in .38 Plus P. At the range we learned that she had no more difficultly shooting the Plus P than the standard .38. Her revolver is no longer made, but is the same as the Lightweight 642, except for the caliber, which is now .38 Special.Zorba wrote: ↑Thu Aug 17, 2023 5:32 amVery expensive too!Gila wrote: ↑Thu Aug 17, 2023 4:36 am I have a S&W Airlite 340PD .357 that weighs a little over half a pound unloaded. It is extremely painful to fire a magnum round in it. If you can find someone who has one and let her try a .38 round in it to compare with what she now has it should stop her whining.
No good deed goes unpunished.
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
Define: stopping power.Gila wrote: ↑Thu Aug 17, 2023 10:43 pmHow much is your wife's or your life worth? My S&W has never failed, it is extremely concealable (I carry mine in my boot), accurate at defensive distances and has very good stopping power. My wife carried basically the same revolver, but with an aluminum frame and in .38 Plus P. At the range we learned that she had no more difficultly shooting the Plus P than the standard .38. Her revolver is no longer made, but is the same as the Lightweight 642, except for the caliber, which is now .38 Special.Zorba wrote: ↑Thu Aug 17, 2023 5:32 amVery expensive too!Gila wrote: ↑Thu Aug 17, 2023 4:36 am I have a S&W Airlite 340PD .357 that weighs a little over half a pound unloaded. It is extremely painful to fire a magnum round in it. If you can find someone who has one and let her try a .38 round in it to compare with what she now has it should stop her whining.
“The shepherd slaughters more of the flock than the wolf ever will.”
-
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2023 12:38 am
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
Zorba is her charter arms SA/DA or DA only? I have a 642 and I have difficulty shooting it well between the DA trigger and a 2 inch barrel. It would be fine for up close and personal for me bit I haven't been comfortable enough with it to carry it. I understand about getting a wife to carry something can be difficult.
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
DA only - which is what she prefers. She doesn't have a problem shooting it - quite the opposite actually - she just finds it too heavy for carry and is looking for options.Kansashunter wrote: ↑Fri Aug 18, 2023 2:32 am Zorba is her charter arms SA/DA or DA only? I have a 642 and I have difficulty shooting it well between the DA trigger and a 2 inch barrel. It would be fine for up close and personal for me bit I haven't been comfortable enough with it to carry it. I understand about getting a wife to carry something can be difficult.
"If you get it and didn't work for it, someone else worked for it and didn't get it..."
)O(
)O(
Re: Lite weight .38 snubbie?
A 125 grain Golden Saber .357 magnum.CPJ 2.0 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 17, 2023 11:06 pmDefine: stopping power.Gila wrote: ↑Thu Aug 17, 2023 10:43 pmHow much is your wife's or your life worth? My S&W has never failed, it is extremely concealable (I carry mine in my boot), accurate at defensive distances and has very good stopping power. My wife carried basically the same revolver, but with an aluminum frame and in .38 Plus P. At the range we learned that she had no more difficultly shooting the Plus P than the standard .38. Her revolver is no longer made, but is the same as the Lightweight 642, except for the caliber, which is now .38 Special.
No good deed goes unpunished.